KAMPALA: Nabasa Pheona Wall, a prominent Ugandan lawyer and former President of the Uganda Law Society (ULS), has been at the center of controversy. A scathing rebuttal from Isaac K. Ssemakadde, the current President of ULS, has brought to light several allegations against Wall.
Ssemakadde accuses Wall of being “an incorrigible liar” and “a fool” who is blind to fundamental judicial precedents. He claims that Wall orchestrated the appointment of Ruth Sebatindira and Norah Matovu Winyi, whom he refers to as “recalled masqueraders,” in violation of ULS election regulations ¹.
Furthermore, Ssemakadde alleges that Wall was complicit in maintaining these illegitimate appointments during her tenure as Vice President of the ULS Council. He also criticizes Wall’s attempts to distance herself from these appointments, calling them “blatant lies” ¹.
In addition to these allegations, Ssemakadde accuses Wall of being ignorant of judicial precedents, citing the cases of Dhikusooka v Attorney General and Gerald Karuhanga v Attorney General. He claims that Wall’s notion of presidential omnipotence is misguided and that she has failed to protect women and promote inclusivity ¹.
Wall’s reputation as a lawyer and advocate has been built on her experience in public relations, energy, oil and gas, company secretarial practice, and labor law. She has served on various boards, including the Uganda Law Society, the Public Relations Association of Uganda, and the East African Business Council.
Despite these credentials, Ssemakadde’s rebuttal raises serious questions about Wall’s integrity and competence. The allegations against her are severe and highlight the need for accountability and transparency in the legal profession.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Pheona Wall is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. While Wall has built a reputation as a respected lawyer and advocate, the allegations against her cannot be ignored. It is essential to hold individuals in positions of power accountable for their actions and to promote transparency and integrity in the legal profession.
